SOKOBAN

to admin1: I see, thanks for explanation! Remarkable by the way: that some players do have registered but haven’t completed anything yet...

to Arnold: the current limit for country is 30 best players (the same number is used for champions in general). The number of registered and productive players may be different - some players have not completed any levels yet.

to admin1: Wow, the separate pages per country are great! Is there any particular reason why only the best players are shown (and why the quantities differ: US 30 of 114, Netherlands 10 of 15, Poland 21 of 23 et cetera)?

to admin1: Thanks for making them sortable! Small detail: can you number the rows in both country-tables, like in champion-lists?

to admin1: Can you make the new country-tables (top 10 and full table) sortable by column? And new idea: separate pages per country would be entirely great, if it's not too much computation. Suggestion: table with rows that are players of that country and columns name of player, completed levels, number of first, second and third places won.

to jans43: I was offline some time, but glad you found it!

to jormawitick: You're right that number of solvers doesn't always indicate complexity, but overall I think it's a good standard.

to Arnold. Had a look around and have now found all the tables.Thanks for your intended help.

To Arnold: This table 3 gives point for assumed "hardness" of the level. (1 point per puzzle is divided between all players who found a solution). Is the level really hard, when only few people has found a solution. I found out that some of best players avoids those big levels, which are easy, but monotonous and boring. That puts those level to hard category. Isn't it.

to Arnold. How do I find Table 3?